FUTO just launched their privacy focused keyboard app. I know there have been quite a few posts about keyboard recommendations, so this might be worth checking out if you’re not happy with your current one.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      2130 days ago

      Huh, thanks for the heads up. Section 4 makes it look like they can close-source whenever they want.

      I’m just glad FUTO is still letting Immich use the AGPL instead of this, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      530 days ago

      This license while not the most permitting does not appear to hide the code behind any proprietary shielding though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -7
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          Ah. Of course. Something being open source doesn’t make it open source. It all makes sense now thank you for clarifying.

          That also wasn’t technically a response to my comment, it was an ideological defense mechanism to avoid addressing the content of the license.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            830 days ago

            Calling source available an open source is like calling shareware an open culture.

            Yeah yeah, it’s open for everyone… For not for list of small but still exceptions

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1330 days ago

            Ah. Of course. Something being open source doesn’t make it open source. It all makes sense now thank you for clarifying.

            If the license doesn’t meet the OSD, then it isn’t open-source, but just source-available. You are welcome.

            That also wasn’t technically a response to my comment, it was an ideological defense mechanism to avoid addressing the content of the license.

            It was. I pointed out, that FTL is a proprietary license. Because: «Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code» © OSI

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -530 days ago

              Yeah I don’t agree with the osd being the only approach to being open source. Turns out people have differing opinions on that. You’re welcome.

              It wasn’t a response to my comment because you didn’t respond to my comment. You said is proprietary. I point out that it’s not a terrible license. Then you resort to a sound bite non response.

              You could have pointed out for example that ftl 3.2 and 4.1 are pretty shitty limitations to impose.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                930 days ago

                Yeah I don’t agree with the osd being the only approach to being open source.

                Well, it isn’t the only one. FSF also has requirements for free-software licenses and FTL doesn’t meet them.

                It wasn’t a response to my comment because you didn’t respond to my comment. You said is proprietary. I point out that it’s not a terrible license.

                I was answering that statement: «does not appear to hide the code behind any proprietary shielding», 'cause it does.

          • umami_wasabi
            link
            fedilink
            730 days ago

            May you explain how it is OSS when the license Section 2.1 doesn’t grant me the right to modify the code?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            230 days ago

            You still shouldn’t dismiss these sorts of licenses as “free software” has done an alright job for user freedoms but not getting developers compensated for their efforts—which is why licenses like these pop up sharing the source code, but not letting their work be exploited.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      630 days ago

      It is open source. But they supposedly keep some rights (they say for some time) so people dont produce fake versions of their software like has happened with newpipe (newpipe versions on google play store bundled with malware). I dont like a license like this but I think I want to trust Louis Rossman. He looks like someone who is truly commited tto his mission.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        You sure? Section 2.1 miss an important keyword: modify. If I can’t modify and distribute my modified version, it can hardly call OSS.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Every day I get more frustrated with swiftkey. This sounds worth a try.

    Aaaaaand not available for iOS. Womp womp.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      730 days ago

      Hard to believe anyone makes apps for iOS, considering the hoops you have to jump through just to make it available to download.

      They keyboard is one big reason I left iOS after only ~3 mos. trying it. It’s absolutely atrocious and I can’t believe anyone uses that…

      Gboard is amazing, and this app (in pre-Alpha) is a close second. They just need to nail down Swype typing and prediction.

      It also has FUTO Voice built-in, which is fully offline voice transcription with punctuation added as well. Works amazing.

      Truly a phenomenal product.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        230 days ago

        Hard to believe anyone makes apps for iOS, considering the hoops you have to jump through just to make it available to download.

        This is something I’ve heard, and assume is the case, but I don’t know the specifics of. What kind of hoops are there?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          530 days ago

          Please correct me if am wrong since I have never made any mobile OS applications.

          There’s the $100 fee or whatever to join the developer program even if your app is free. There is a slow manual review process. You have to share a 30% cut with Apple of any profit. Most of the tooling for iOS requires a macOS machine which is another massive money sink as well as being proprietary with no source available. I believe GPL or similarly licensed code isn’t allowed on the App Store either due to ToS conflicts.

          Most privacy-friendly things take an source available, open source, free software, or other (post-open, copyfarleft) approach that conflicts with Apple’s model for software, but also developers are likely to be on Linux or BSD + a Linux or Android phone where everything will be more arduous to build & test while not even being a device they or their friends would use so why both building if likely you aren’t even getting paid for it.

    • @supesA
      link
      fedilink
      2430 days ago

      Openboard is dead and hasn’t been developed in years. If you want an updated version of that, go with Heliboard. Futo also has voice to text capabilities. I currently have heliboard and futo both installed, buy may just switch to futo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      730 days ago

      Been a while since I tried open board, florisboard, or anything else but I remember they didn’t have one of a few mandatory features (for me):

      • adjustable height
      • number row
      • long-press layer
      • Swype typing

      This has them all. Plus an awesome voice transcription using Whisper.

      It’s free to try (they ask to pay $10 for a lifetime license but you can use it without paying, though you shouldn’t). It has no internet connectivity. Give it a go.

      • Simon Müller
        link
        fedilink
        1330 days ago

        Just FYI, Heliboard (continuation of OpenBoard) has all of the above. Just note that you’ll need to import Google’s Swype library once to use Swipe-To-Type.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          330 days ago

          I’d say the main benefit Futo has over Heliboard is that it has native swype typing with its own model (and also own voice typing model).

          Still a bit light on customisation (certainly compared to Heliboard), but a nice first release certainly.

            • Otter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              730 days ago

              Yea I’d prefer to wait until it’s on fdroid proper

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                329 days ago

                It can’t be included in the official F-Droid repos, as it is not Open Source.

                It’s hardly better than any other proprietary software as the FUTO Temporary License does not allow users to make modifications and share them with non-programmers. They could include ads or spyware and no one would be allowed to strip that out and share the result with others.

                They also clearly forbid redistribution “directed towards […] monetary compensation”. But F-Droid has to be compensated for their server costs as well, and they ask for donations as they should be. That’s why limiting commercial redistribution alone is a huge issue that would keep it from ever being called “Open Source” or “Free Software”.

    • Sunny' 🌻OP
      link
      fedilink
      230 days ago

      Sorry, was the only way to share the app. I know it’s not optimal, personally I use Aurora Store to grab it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      329 days ago

      It can’t be included in the official F-Droid repos, as it is not Open Source.

      It’s hardly better than any other proprietary software as the FUTO Temporary License does not allow users to make modifications and share them with non-programmers. They could include ads or spyware and no one would be allowed to strip that out and share the result with others.

      They also clearly forbid redistribution “directed towards […] monetary compensation”. But F-Droid has to be compensated for their server costs as well, and they ask for donations as they should be. That’s why limiting commercial redistribution alone is a huge issue that would keep it from ever being called “Open Source” or “Free Software”.

  • Autonomous User
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    WARNING Anti-libre software, FUTO Keyboard and Google Play, bans us from removing malicious source code.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    230 days ago

    Looks nice! Hope they add Korean and Chinese characters as that doesn’t seem to be working for now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    230 days ago

    Awesome. Every so often I try a few different keyboards but always go right back to SwiftKey because the predictions are so good. I’ll give this one a shot

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      It’s the voice recognition model probably. Plus there are machine learning models in it as well to predict text.

    • Joël de Bruijn
      link
      fedilink
      330 days ago

      For example, because its autocorrect in a multi-language setting is pretty bad (autocorrecting wrong language even if its manually switched).

  • Bob
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    Finally an option that is not just a dumb keyboard, this one has some local llms and local speech to text, so that’s pretty cool. Currently there’s no multilingual mode and I can’t find a way to adjust the height, but once these features are there I’ll happily switch.