FUTO just launched their privacy focused keyboard app. I know there have been quite a few posts about keyboard recommendations, so this might be worth checking out if you’re not happy with your current one.

    • @supesA
      link
      fedilink
      246 months ago

      Openboard is dead and hasn’t been developed in years. If you want an updated version of that, go with Heliboard. Futo also has voice to text capabilities. I currently have heliboard and futo both installed, buy may just switch to futo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      Been a while since I tried open board, florisboard, or anything else but I remember they didn’t have one of a few mandatory features (for me):

      • adjustable height
      • number row
      • long-press layer
      • Swype typing

      This has them all. Plus an awesome voice transcription using Whisper.

      It’s free to try (they ask to pay $10 for a lifetime license but you can use it without paying, though you shouldn’t). It has no internet connectivity. Give it a go.

      • Simon Müller
        link
        fedilink
        136 months ago

        Just FYI, Heliboard (continuation of OpenBoard) has all of the above. Just note that you’ll need to import Google’s Swype library once to use Swipe-To-Type.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          I’d say the main benefit Futo has over Heliboard is that it has native swype typing with its own model (and also own voice typing model).

          Still a bit light on customisation (certainly compared to Heliboard), but a nice first release certainly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      216 months ago

      Huh, thanks for the heads up. Section 4 makes it look like they can close-source whenever they want.

      I’m just glad FUTO is still letting Immich use the AGPL instead of this, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      56 months ago

      This license while not the most permitting does not appear to hide the code behind any proprietary shielding though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -7
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ah. Of course. Something being open source doesn’t make it open source. It all makes sense now thank you for clarifying.

          That also wasn’t technically a response to my comment, it was an ideological defense mechanism to avoid addressing the content of the license.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            86 months ago

            Calling source available an open source is like calling shareware an open culture.

            Yeah yeah, it’s open for everyone… For not for list of small but still exceptions

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -56 months ago

              Yeah I don’t agree with the osd being the only approach to being open source. Turns out people have differing opinions on that. You’re welcome.

              It wasn’t a response to my comment because you didn’t respond to my comment. You said is proprietary. I point out that it’s not a terrible license. Then you resort to a sound bite non response.

              You could have pointed out for example that ftl 3.2 and 4.1 are pretty shitty limitations to impose.

          • umami_wasabi
            link
            fedilink
            76 months ago

            May you explain how it is OSS when the license Section 2.1 doesn’t grant me the right to modify the code?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            You still shouldn’t dismiss these sorts of licenses as “free software” has done an alright job for user freedoms but not getting developers compensated for their efforts—which is why licenses like these pop up sharing the source code, but not letting their work be exploited.

    • geoma
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      It is open source. But they supposedly keep some rights (they say for some time) so people dont produce fake versions of their software like has happened with newpipe (newpipe versions on google play store bundled with malware). I dont like a license like this but I think I want to trust Louis Rossman. He looks like someone who is truly commited tto his mission.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        20
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You sure? Section 2.1 miss an important keyword: modify. If I can’t modify and distribute my modified version, it can hardly call OSS.

    • Detective'OP
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      Sorry, was the only way to share the app. I know it’s not optimal, personally I use Aurora Store to grab it.

            • Otter
              link
              fedilink
              English
              76 months ago

              Yea I’d prefer to wait until it’s on fdroid proper

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                36 months ago

                It can’t be included in the official F-Droid repos, as it is not Open Source.

                It’s hardly better than any other proprietary software as the FUTO Temporary License does not allow users to make modifications and share them with non-programmers. They could include ads or spyware and no one would be allowed to strip that out and share the result with others.

                They also clearly forbid redistribution “directed towards […] monetary compensation”. But F-Droid has to be compensated for their server costs as well, and they ask for donations as they should be. That’s why limiting commercial redistribution alone is a huge issue that would keep it from ever being called “Open Source” or “Free Software”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      It can’t be included in the official F-Droid repos, as it is not Open Source.

      It’s hardly better than any other proprietary software as the FUTO Temporary License does not allow users to make modifications and share them with non-programmers. They could include ads or spyware and no one would be allowed to strip that out and share the result with others.

      They also clearly forbid redistribution “directed towards […] monetary compensation”. But F-Droid has to be compensated for their server costs as well, and they ask for donations as they should be. That’s why limiting commercial redistribution alone is a huge issue that would keep it from ever being called “Open Source” or “Free Software”.

  • DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Every day I get more frustrated with swiftkey. This sounds worth a try.

    Aaaaaand not available for iOS. Womp womp.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      Hard to believe anyone makes apps for iOS, considering the hoops you have to jump through just to make it available to download.

      They keyboard is one big reason I left iOS after only ~3 mos. trying it. It’s absolutely atrocious and I can’t believe anyone uses that…

      Gboard is amazing, and this app (in pre-Alpha) is a close second. They just need to nail down Swype typing and prediction.

      It also has FUTO Voice built-in, which is fully offline voice transcription with punctuation added as well. Works amazing.

      Truly a phenomenal product.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Hard to believe anyone makes apps for iOS, considering the hoops you have to jump through just to make it available to download.

        This is something I’ve heard, and assume is the case, but I don’t know the specifics of. What kind of hoops are there?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          56 months ago

          Please correct me if am wrong since I have never made any mobile OS applications.

          There’s the $100 fee or whatever to join the developer program even if your app is free. There is a slow manual review process. You have to share a 30% cut with Apple of any profit. Most of the tooling for iOS requires a macOS machine which is another massive money sink as well as being proprietary with no source available. I believe GPL or similarly licensed code isn’t allowed on the App Store either due to ToS conflicts.

          Most privacy-friendly things take an source available, open source, free software, or other (post-open, copyfarleft) approach that conflicts with Apple’s model for software, but also developers are likely to be on Linux or BSD + a Linux or Android phone where everything will be more arduous to build & test while not even being a device they or their friends would use so why both building if likely you aren’t even getting paid for it.

  • foremanguy
    link
    fedilink
    46 months ago

    Just use heliboard (openboard’s fork to accept multiple languages spelling-correction), you dont have to search further

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Id use it but the hindi keyboard sucks and I dont know how to fix it (inscript with “capitalized” underlay)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    So far it seems quite impressive. Also has scroll on spacebar swipe which I wasn’t expecting but is a great touch.

    Not sure I can live without a gif search but given that would require network access and reduce privacy, maybe it makes sense to just change to gboard when needing gif search then switch back for everything else. Not too annoying so far.

    I’ve been meaning to try helisboard buy having to add in the swipe and then also add in futo voice to text felt like a project and this is an all in one which is great.

  • 2ugly2live
    link
    fedilink
    56 months ago

    Thank you for the recommendation. I’ve been dying to get rid of Swiftkey. 🙏🏾 So far, it seems to work well.

  • Pasta Dental
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    Finally an option that is not just a dumb keyboard, this one has some local llms and local speech to text, so that’s pretty cool. Currently there’s no multilingual mode and I can’t find a way to adjust the height, but once these features are there I’ll happily switch.

    • Joël de Bruijn
      link
      fedilink
      36 months ago

      For example, because its autocorrect in a multi-language setting is pretty bad (autocorrecting wrong language even if its manually switched).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    26 months ago

    Looks nice! Hope they add Korean and Chinese characters as that doesn’t seem to be working for now.